<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kyle Smith &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.infinitechaos.com/tag/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com</link>
	<description>No magic here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thanks, but I think I&#8217;ll keep my account number to myself</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/12/31/thanks-but-i-think-ill-keep-my-account-number-to-myself/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/12/31/thanks-but-i-think-ill-keep-my-account-number-to-myself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 04:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/12/31/thanks-but-i-think-ill-keep-my-account-number-to-myself/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the risk and cost involved in having a data breach at a large company these days? The Associated Press reported today that personal data loss hit record levels in 2007. Between the TJX break-in early in the year and the weekly reports of unencrypted tapes being lost or stolen, I&#8217;m really not surprised. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the risk and cost involved in having a data breach at a large company these days?</p>
<p>The Associated Press reported today that <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2007/12/31/personal_data_loss_hit_record_level_in_07/" title="Personal data loss hits record level in '07">personal data loss hit record levels</a> in 2007.  Between the TJX break-in early in the year and the weekly reports of unencrypted tapes being lost or stolen, I&#8217;m really not surprised.</p>
<p>To be honest, I think companies that aren&#8217;t smart enough to use encryption for their data <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/tape/ts1120/index.html" title="IBM System Storage TS1120">when it&#8217;s readily available</a> deserve to be hit.  This seems like a case where legislation to mandate back-end data encryption would be good, but instead banks are being told to add <a href="http://bankwide.com/index.php/Articles/Security/A-Letter-From-Hackers-Thanks-for-Multifactor-Authentication.html" title="A letter from hackers: Thanks for MFA">stupid security features</a> like multi-factor authentication to secure the front-end.</p>
<p>What strikes me as even more silly is that given the exorbitant cost of a breach [1], companies still want to be the keepers of customers&#8217; personal or financial data and impose fees on the customers that don&#8217;t want to share it.  For example, my auto insurance company has an extra $5/mo. service fee for customers that opt to make payments themselves instead of providing bank account information to them and letting them pull the money via an electronic fund transfer (EFT).</p>
<p>Given that there is little to no security for most electronic transfers (all you need are routing and bank account numbers and a willing bank), I am reluctant these days to provide my bank account information to most companies.  I don&#8217;t even provide my credit card number to most service or utility providers any more.  Instead I use my bank&#8217;s online bill pay feature and have them push the money electronically or via a paper check in the mail [2].</p>
<p>But hey, instead of charging a fee why not pay me a few bucks to keep my sensitive information to myself as long as my payments are made in a timely manner?  I&#8217;m doing you a favor because if you don&#8217;t have my account number, I can&#8217;t sue you later for accidentally disclosing it.</p>
<p>[1] The public settlement TJX made with financial institutions was around $40M and included 3 years of credit protection to consumers plus fraud insurance.</p>
<p>[2] Still not great, as most of these checks are done as personal checks and not bank checks (which wouldn&#8217;t include your account number), but one can hope that an electronic record containing account information isn&#8217;t created by the recipient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/12/31/thanks-but-i-think-ill-keep-my-account-number-to-myself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

