<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: While I&#8217;m at it&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/12/02/while-im-at-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/12/02/while-im-at-it/</link>
	<description>No magic here</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/12/02/while-im-at-it/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/12/02/while-im-at-it/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>I can't really speak to actual metrics, but here are a few things I noticed comparing Sun vs. IBM when doing alot of Eclipse and app server work:

1) IBM may claim to have a full implementation of the JVM, but there were several times (especially when related to SOAP/XML code) where the IBM JVM would crash for no good reason.  Sun's didn't have this problem.  (Disclaimer: this was a year and some change ago, so this may be fixed by now.)

2) If you can find all the right settings to tweak (I'll see if I can dig up the documentation for this), the IBM JVM + Eclipse will run faster than the Sun JVM + Eclipse.  Admittedly the difference isn't *that* huge, but if you're in Eclipse all day it can be a nice thing to have.

3) I found IBM's JVM to be less stable.  Granted, this may have been trying to mix and match and use both, but I still think that Sun's seemed to be more reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t really speak to actual metrics, but here are a few things I noticed comparing Sun vs. IBM when doing alot of Eclipse and app server work:</p>
<p>1) IBM may claim to have a full implementation of the JVM, but there were several times (especially when related to SOAP/XML code) where the IBM JVM would crash for no good reason.  Sun&#8217;s didn&#8217;t have this problem.  (Disclaimer: this was a year and some change ago, so this may be fixed by now.)</p>
<p>2) If you can find all the right settings to tweak (I&#8217;ll see if I can dig up the documentation for this), the IBM JVM + Eclipse will run faster than the Sun JVM + Eclipse.  Admittedly the difference isn&#8217;t *that* huge, but if you&#8217;re in Eclipse all day it can be a nice thing to have.</p>
<p>3) I found IBM&#8217;s JVM to be less stable.  Granted, this may have been trying to mix and match and use both, but I still think that Sun&#8217;s seemed to be more reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
