<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the stone age to the future in 6 weeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/</link>
	<description>No magic here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 02:55:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Jay,

The desktop PC that I&#039;ve been running player on at home is a 1.7 GHz Athlon XP w/768 MB of RAM and it seems to run okay.  The main issue I&#039;ve had is running Player and Eclipse at the same time (developing outside of the VM and publishing to it), because Eclipse wants more RAM (I&#039;ve got a lot of plugins and features installed depending on what language or toolkit I&#039;m using).

As for Workstation vs. Server, the beta of Server 2.0 was not out yet and WS6 is significantly better than Server 1.0 (see http://www.virtualization.info/lab/VMwareWKS60_vs_VMwareSVR10.pdf).  And I ended up using Player on my home machine because I could easily get Gutsy packages for it (and Player 2.0.x was also better than Server at the time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>The desktop PC that I&#8217;ve been running player on at home is a 1.7 GHz Athlon XP w/768 MB of RAM and it seems to run okay.  The main issue I&#8217;ve had is running Player and Eclipse at the same time (developing outside of the VM and publishing to it), because Eclipse wants more RAM (I&#8217;ve got a lot of plugins and features installed depending on what language or toolkit I&#8217;m using).</p>
<p>As for Workstation vs. Server, the beta of Server 2.0 was not out yet and WS6 is significantly better than Server 1.0 (see <a href="http://www.virtualization.info/lab/VMwareWKS60_vs_VMwareSVR10.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualization.info/lab/VMwareWKS60_vs_VMwareSVR10.pdf</a>).  And I ended up using Player on my home machine because I could easily get Gutsy packages for it (and Player 2.0.x was also better than Server at the time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Kyle,
I&#039;m surprised that you&#039;re using &quot;older&quot; VMware products, like workstation and player. Why not Server? Since it&#039;s just as free and I&#039;m pretty sure more functional. I&#039;m not 100% on the image portability though.
I think you&#039;re right that it&#039;s nice to see such a pervasive use of an enabling technology (that&#039;s so enabling exactly because it&#039;s so pervasive).
I&#039;ve been thinking that as soon as I can get my home server straightened up (which will take some effort) I&#039;ll get a few more appliances going at home... but now you made me think that I need a better machine ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle,<br />
I&#8217;m surprised that you&#8217;re using &#8220;older&#8221; VMware products, like workstation and player. Why not Server? Since it&#8217;s just as free and I&#8217;m pretty sure more functional. I&#8217;m not 100% on the image portability though.<br />
I think you&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s nice to see such a pervasive use of an enabling technology (that&#8217;s so enabling exactly because it&#8217;s so pervasive).<br />
I&#8217;ve been thinking that as soon as I can get my home server straightened up (which will take some effort) I&#8217;ll get a few more appliances going at home&#8230; but now you made me think that I need a better machine <img src='http://blog.infinitechaos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rouslan Solomakhin</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Rouslan Solomakhin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>I agree that vmware products rock. They save &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mobilearmor.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;us&lt;/a&gt; a bunch of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that vmware products rock. They save <a href="http://www.mobilearmor.com" rel="nofollow">us</a> a bunch of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>I have not played with Xen or KVM.  I don&#039;t have the hardware for KVM and I&#039;m not really interested in changing the setup on my personal box, so I&#039;m limited to hosted virtualization options.

Also, I need to be careful when it comes to viewing source for other virtualization products. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not played with Xen or KVM.  I don&#8217;t have the hardware for KVM and I&#8217;m not really interested in changing the setup on my personal box, so I&#8217;m limited to hosted virtualization options.</p>
<p>Also, I need to be careful when it comes to viewing source for other virtualization products. <img src='http://blog.infinitechaos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j b</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>j b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Have you played with Xen, KVM, and friends as well? I&#039;ve used VMware and Xen both quite a bit. I would recommend giving a lighter virtualization a spin.

I wouldn&#039;t say vmware is a cure all for all virtualization purposes.
but then, I haven&#039;t tried all their products, so perhaps they DO have a cure all :-b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you played with Xen, KVM, and friends as well? I&#8217;ve used VMware and Xen both quite a bit. I would recommend giving a lighter virtualization a spin.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say vmware is a cure all for all virtualization purposes.<br />
but then, I haven&#8217;t tried all their products, so perhaps they DO have a cure all :-b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

