<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the stone age to the future in 6 weeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/</link>
	<description>No magic here</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Jay,

The desktop PC that I've been running player on at home is a 1.7 GHz Athlon XP w/768 MB of RAM and it seems to run okay.  The main issue I've had is running Player and Eclipse at the same time (developing outside of the VM and publishing to it), because Eclipse wants more RAM (I've got a lot of plugins and features installed depending on what language or toolkit I'm using).

As for Workstation vs. Server, the beta of Server 2.0 was not out yet and WS6 is significantly better than Server 1.0 (see http://www.virtualization.info/lab/VMwareWKS60_vs_VMwareSVR10.pdf).  And I ended up using Player on my home machine because I could easily get Gutsy packages for it (and Player 2.0.x was also better than Server at the time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>The desktop PC that I&#8217;ve been running player on at home is a 1.7 GHz Athlon XP w/768 MB of RAM and it seems to run okay.  The main issue I&#8217;ve had is running Player and Eclipse at the same time (developing outside of the VM and publishing to it), because Eclipse wants more RAM (I&#8217;ve got a lot of plugins and features installed depending on what language or toolkit I&#8217;m using).</p>
<p>As for Workstation vs. Server, the beta of Server 2.0 was not out yet and WS6 is significantly better than Server 1.0 (see <a href="http://www.virtualization.info/lab/VMwareWKS60_vs_VMwareSVR10.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualization.info/lab/VMwareWKS60_vs_VMwareSVR10.pdf</a>).  And I ended up using Player on my home machine because I could easily get Gutsy packages for it (and Player 2.0.x was also better than Server at the time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Kyle,
I'm surprised that you're using "older" VMware products, like workstation and player. Why not Server? Since it's just as free and I'm pretty sure more functional. I'm not 100% on the image portability though.
I think you're right that it's nice to see such a pervasive use of an enabling technology (that's so enabling exactly because it's so pervasive).
I've been thinking that as soon as I can get my home server straightened up (which will take some effort) I'll get a few more appliances going at home... but now you made me think that I need a better machine ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle,<br />
I&#8217;m surprised that you&#8217;re using &#8220;older&#8221; VMware products, like workstation and player. Why not Server? Since it&#8217;s just as free and I&#8217;m pretty sure more functional. I&#8217;m not 100% on the image portability though.<br />
I think you&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s nice to see such a pervasive use of an enabling technology (that&#8217;s so enabling exactly because it&#8217;s so pervasive).<br />
I&#8217;ve been thinking that as soon as I can get my home server straightened up (which will take some effort) I&#8217;ll get a few more appliances going at home&#8230; but now you made me think that I need a better machine <img src='http://blog.infinitechaos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rouslan Solomakhin</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Rouslan Solomakhin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>I agree that vmware products rock. They save &lt;a href="http://www.mobilearmor.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;us&lt;/a&gt; a bunch of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that vmware products rock. They save <a href="http://www.mobilearmor.com" rel="nofollow">us</a> a bunch of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>I have not played with Xen or KVM.  I don't have the hardware for KVM and I'm not really interested in changing the setup on my personal box, so I'm limited to hosted virtualization options.

Also, I need to be careful when it comes to viewing source for other virtualization products. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not played with Xen or KVM.  I don&#8217;t have the hardware for KVM and I&#8217;m not really interested in changing the setup on my personal box, so I&#8217;m limited to hosted virtualization options.</p>
<p>Also, I need to be careful when it comes to viewing source for other virtualization products. <img src='http://blog.infinitechaos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j b</title>
		<link>http://blog.infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>j b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infinitechaos.com/2007/11/17/from-the-stone-age-to-the-future-in-6-weeks/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Have you played with Xen, KVM, and friends as well? I've used VMware and Xen both quite a bit. I would recommend giving a lighter virtualization a spin.

I wouldn't say vmware is a cure all for all virtualization purposes.
but then, I haven't tried all their products, so perhaps they DO have a cure all :-b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you played with Xen, KVM, and friends as well? I&#8217;ve used VMware and Xen both quite a bit. I would recommend giving a lighter virtualization a spin.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say vmware is a cure all for all virtualization purposes.<br />
but then, I haven&#8217;t tried all their products, so perhaps they DO have a cure all :-b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
